mAi
c13d84d0f3
Per-screen + per-server-helper audit. Identifies six deepening
opportunities ranked by leverage:
T1: §3.A per-question-type module bundle (highest leverage; closes a
real server-side date_ranked_choice validation gap; unblocks i18n)
T2: §3.C withOwnedInstance wrapper, §3.D findExistingSubmission helper,
§3.F testability gaps
T3: §3.B ChatPanel + FormEditor component extraction, §3.E
feedback_instances repository
Each candidate explained against the deletion test (LANGUAGE.md vocab):
modules, depth, locality, leverage, seams, adapters. Tier-1 is the only
load-bearing refactor; tier-2 are small independent wins; tier-3 is
medium-cost cleanup that gets easier after tier-1.
Anti-scope listed: no new deps, no CSS split, no real-time migration,
no auth tier on /f/[slug], no port/adapter for fdb (one adapter =
hypothetical seam, per LANGUAGE.md).
5 open questions for m at the end before any code lands.
Design only — no source files touched. Awaiting m's pick before any
coder shift.
fdbck.msbls.de
Per-link feedback forms and live-chat masks. Anonymous, slug-gated, no auth required for participants.
Spun out from m/flexsiebels.de issue #63 — full design at docs/plans/feedback-feature.md.
Stack
SvelteKit 5 + Svelte 5 + bun + @sveltejs/adapter-node. Postgres + Supabase auth. Schema: fdbck.feedback_{instances,submissions,posts} on supa.flexsiebels.de (msupabase).
Run locally
cp .env.example .env # fill SUPABASE_*
bun install
bun run dev
Test + check
bun run test # rate-limit + public-scope unit tests
bun run check # svelte-check (type errors / a11y)
bun run build # adapter-node production build → ./build
Deploy
Dockerfile uses oven/bun:latest. Dokploy app: fdbck.msbls.de. DNS via Hostinger (handled out of band).
Structure
src/
hooks.server.ts — auth + public-scope policy gate
lib/server/
auth.ts — cookie JWT + Supabase refresh
fdb.ts — Postgres `fdbck` schema accessor
feedback.ts — slug generator + DB helpers + rate-limit constants
public-scope.ts — anonymous-DB-access fail-closed gate
rate-limit.ts — in-memory token bucket
schemas.ts — Zod request validation
supabase.ts — admin + anon client singletons
routes/
+page.svelte — landing
f/[slug]/ — public participant page (form + live chat)
admin/feedback/ — m's admin (list + detail + create)
api/
auth/ — sign-in / sign-out
public/feedback/ — anonymous slug-gated endpoints
admin/feedback/ — owner-scoped admin endpoints
Data model (canonical: design doc §5)
fdbck.feedback_instances— slug, title, description, owner_user_id, form_definition (jsonb), chat_enabled, status (open|closed), closed_atfdbck.feedback_submissions— instance_id, display_name (nullable = anonymous), client_session_id, answers (jsonb), client_ip, user_agentfdbck.feedback_posts— instance_id, display_name, client_session_id, body, hidden (m soft-moderate), client_ip, user_agent
Anti-abuse layers
- 32-char base62 slugs (~190 bits entropy)
- in-memory rate-limit (30 posts / 5 min, 10 submits / 5 min, per IP+slug)
- honeypot field on forms + chat (silently dropped)
- body length caps + closing kill-switch
- noindex meta +
robots.txtDisallow: /
Out of scope (v1)
Drag-drop form-builder · post reactions · realtime/SSE · CAPTCHA · trusted-tier owner sharing · branding/theming · auto-notifications. All have a clean upgrade path on the existing schema.
Issue origin
m/flexsiebels.de#63 — m PWA-voice 2026-05-05: "Im Wesentlichen quasi Microsoft Forms und Teams-Feedback in einem auf einer Webseite."