m/paliad
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 146 Pull Requests 8 Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(t-paliad-207): fermi close-out assessment — verdict (A) DONE

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
mAi
2026-05-20 10:46:48 +02:00
parent 2504e50f29 4472faf224
commit 1a8eee2a10
1 changed files with 52 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

52
docs/t-paliad-207-followup-scope.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
# t-paliad-207 follow-up scope — close-out assessment
**Author:** fermi (inventor)
**Date:** 2026-05-20
**Verdict:** **(A) DONE** — interactive session scope is shipped; remaining tail is filed-or-fileable as discrete issues, not a fresh fermi slice.
---
## 0. What shipped under t-paliad-207
Six substantive deliveries on `mai/fermi/interactive-session`, all merged to main as of 2026-05-20 morning:
1. **Verfahrensablauf + Fristenrechner polish** — jurisdiction prefix on the picked proceeding, trigger-event label derived from the root rule, flag rows lifted to `/tools/verfahrensablauf`, rule references rendered as `youpc.org/laws#…` links via new `BuildLegalSourceURL`, `Vorab-Einrede → Einspruch` rename (DE i18n).
2. **DE proceeding picker — sub-group headers** (`Verletzungsverfahren` / `Nichtigkeitsverfahren`) + parallel labels (`LG (1. Instanz)` / `OLG (Berufung)` / …).
3. **mig 099** — drop the `with_po` flag from the two RoP 19 rules (Einspruch is always-available, not flag-gated).
4. **mig 100** — `upc.inf.cfi.ccr` visible rule (`Nichtigkeitswiderklage`) so the CCR filing event surfaces when `with_ccr` is set; later corrected to `priority='optional'` via mig 101.
5. **mig 101** — strip rule-cite brackets from the two Einspruch names + flip the CCR priority `informational → optional`.
6. **mig 102** — track-aware sequence reshuffle on `upc.inf.cfi` so at any tied date the order is infringement (Replik) → revocation (Erwiderung Nichtigkeitswiderklage) → amendment.
7. **Notes toggle** — `Hinweise anzeigen` checkbox in the view-toggle bar; compact ⓘ hover hint when off (default), inline `timeline-notes` block when on. `localStorage` shared across both tool pages.
Filed two follow-up issues during the session:
- **m/paliad#39** — link DE + EPA + EU rule references to `youpc.org/laws` (depends on youpc.org ingesting the corpus).
- **m/paliad#41** — DE proceedings as one combined timeline per type (LG→OLG→BGH, BPatG→BGH) — corpus + spawn + de-duplication + multi-instance UI.
## 1. Why (A) DONE
Every concrete thing m surfaced in the session was addressed and merged. The two larger unaddressed asks — combined-timeline behaviour for DE proceedings, and DE/EPA rule-link coverage — are already captured in #39 and #41 with concrete scope notes. Neither belongs as a fermi "next slice" because:
- **#41** is a corpus + UI design pass of its own (3 new spawn rules, de-duplication of the existing `de.inf.lg.berufung ↔ de.inf.olg.berufung` pair, multi-court picker shape, instance markers in the timeline body). That's its own design ticket, not a fermi follow-up.
- **#39** is primarily a youpc.org-side ingest task; the paliad-side change is a 5-line `switch` extension once youpc serves the URLs. Wait for the dependency, then small.
Everything else I surfaced in the read-only audit is either pre-existing (not introduced by this session) or speculative (no user complaint behind it).
## 2. Optional tail — would file as discrete issues, not a fermi slice
Surfacing these for completeness; none are blocking, and most would be small enough to either roll into the existing tickets or land as one-off polish:
| # | Candidate | Size | Already covered? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | **`legal_source` backfill on 47 unsourced active rules** — query: 4 of `upc.inf.cfi`, 4 of `upc.pi.cfi` (100% gap), 6 of `upc.rev.cfi`, others. Pre-condition for #39's links to bite. | Medium — corpus research per rule | Partially: huygens did the broader citation backfill in t-paliad-208 / mig 097. This is the remaining tail. |
| 2 | **`upc.pi.cfi` corpus completeness audit** — all 4 of its rules lack `legal_source`; likely also missing the analogous track-of-decision spawn rules to `upc.apl.merits`. | Small audit, medium fix | No — would be a fresh task. |
| 3 | **Touch-device fallback for the ⓘ hover hint** — `title=` attribute degrades poorly on phones (no hover, no tap-to-show). Either a click-to-popover variant, or accept the gap. | Tiny | No, but no user complaint yet. |
| 4 | **R.46 mutatis-mutandis distinction in `upc.rev.cfi.prelim` description** — when mig 101 stripped the `(R. 19 i.V.m. R. 46)` cite, the legal nuance dropped from the user-visible name. Could be surfaced in the description text where it doesn't crowd the timeline cell. | Tiny (one row update) | No. |
| 5 | **Save-modal warning on SoD + CCR double-check** — with mig 100's new `upc.inf.cfi.ccr` rule, a user can save both `sod` and `ccr` from the same modal and get two `paliad.deadlines` rows on the same date. Today's pre-uncheck behaviour for optional priority mitigates accidental double-write but doesn't surface the duplication actively. | Small | No. |
| 6 | **Deferred slices from earlier design docs that touch this surface**: t-paliad-179 Slice 2-4 (variant chips, lane view, side-by-side compare on `/tools/verfahrensablauf`); t-paliad-169 "+ Eintrag" CTA on the SmartTimeline (project-bound) path. | Each a separate slice. | Yes — parked from their original tasks; would be revisited when m prioritises. |
None of these warrant a "next fermi slice" right now. They're polish + corpus tail, and best handled as individual issues that m can pick from.
## 3. Recommendation
Close t-paliad-207. Fire fermi. The remaining tail (items 1–6 above) is appropriate as a small "polish backlog" m can dip into when relevant, but not a coherent unit of work that needs a parked inventor.